Enhancing COVID-19 (COVID-19/SARI/SVP) pandemic preparedness: Assessment of testing and treatment capacity of the health facilities in Can Tho City, Vietnam in 2023

Các tác giả

  • Hồ Thị Thiên Ngân Trường Đại học Quốc tế Hồng Bàng
  • Lê Văn Tuấn Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành
  • Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Anh Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc (CHAI)
  • Đặng Văn Chinh Viện Y Tế Công Cộng TP. HCM
  • Nguyễn Quang Huy Viện Y Tế Công Cộng TP. HCM
  • Huỳnh Minh Trực Trung tâm kiểm soát bệnh tật tỉnh Cần Thơ
  • Trần Trường Chinh Trung tâm kiểm soát bệnh tật tỉnh Cần Thơ
  • Nguyễn Nhân Nghĩa Trung tâm kiểm soát bệnh tật tỉnh Cần Thơ
  • Hoàng Quốc Cường Sở Y tế TP. Cần Thơ
  • Phạm Phú Trường Giang Sở Y tế TP. Cần Thơ
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59294/HIUJS.VOL.6.2024.625

Từ khóa:

COVID-19/SARI/SVP, sẵn sàng ứng phó đại dịch, xét nghiệm và điều trị, năng lực

Abstract

Vietnam was amongst the top fifteen countries most affected by COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 and 2022. Within Vietnam, Can Tho City witnessed a high case fatality rate at about 12.5 per 1,000 cases, which was higher than that of the nation's average death rate of 3.7 per 1,000 cases. This study aims at evaluating the COVID-19 tests and assessing the capacities of healthcare facilities (HFs) to prepare plans and robust health systems in strengthening pandemic response. We conducted a survey in September 2023 across 53 out of total 130 HFs in Can Tho City, including both private and public hospitals at central, provincial and district level. There were nine different aspects in each HF that worth evaluating whether: namely bed capacity, human resources, hospital capacity for receiving new patients, current treatment approaches for mild/moderate/severe/critical ill patients, medication management capacities, medical supplies and equipment, laboratory testing capacities, infection prevention and control, and communicable disease reporting. Results revealed that regarding the overall capacity, under normal condition, only 1.9% of healthcare facilities (HFs) met the standards for strong capacity, 52.8% with satisfactory capacity and the remaining 30.2% showed unsatisfactory capacity management. Conversely, during the COVID-19 pandemic, no HF reached our expectations for hospital capacity, whereas 52.8% had satisfactory capacity and 32.1% had unsatisfactory capacity. Furthermore, the insufficiency of appropriate medications can be seen in 72% of HFs, 45% HFs had limited testing capabilities, 42% HFs need to optimize hospital bed capacity and 43% struggled to cope with severe cases. Regular assessment plays a vital role in improving the overall pandemic preparedness, especially during the waves of COVID-19 infection, the appearance of new coronavirus variants and increasing virulence of the virus. The coordination at the national level to implement such assessments will bolster future pandemic preparedness and response.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Viet Nam Ministry of Health COVID-19 information portal. https://covid19.gov.vn/.

[2] Prime Minister Resolution 128/CP 11 October 2021 Provision Regulations on “Safety, Flexibility, and Effective Control of COVID-19 Epidemic”. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/EN/The-thao-Y-te/Resolution-128-NQ-CP-2021-Safety-flexibility-and-effective-control-of-COVID19-epidemic/491542/tieng-anh.aspx.

[3] Can Tho City Health Department and CDC 2021 – 2023 COVID-19 reports. ttps://pbgdpl.cantho.gov.vn/
ket-qua-03-nam-cong-tac-phong-chong-dich-covid-19-tai-can-tho; and https://cdccantho.vn/covid-19/

[4] WHO-COVID-19 case management capacities: diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccine readiness, and other health products – facility assessment tool – A module from the suite of health service capacity assessment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Version 7 July 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/
10665/342473?locale-attribute=es&

[5] Viet Hoang. The COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam – success, crisis, and endemic: Key thresholds and lessons. Journal of Global Health. 2022; 12: 03065. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.03065. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676043/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.03065

[6] Saqif Mustafa, Yu Zhang, Zandile Zibwowa et al. COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective. Health Policy Plan. 2022 Feb; 37(2): 255–268. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab089.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385840/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab089

[7] Gizachew A Tessema, Yohannes Kinfu, Berihun Assefa Dachew et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare systems in Africa: a scoping review of preparedness, impact and response. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(12): e007179. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007179. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8637314/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007179

[8] World Health Organization. Indicators to monitor health-care capacity and utilization for decision-making on COVID-19. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/333754/WPR-DSE-2021-026-eng.pdf

[9] World Health Organization. COVID-19 Health Service Readiness Assessments - Annex 2. https://hlh.who.int/docs/librariesprovider4/default-document-library/annex-2-covid-19-health-service-readiness-assessments.pdf

Tải xuống

Số lượt xem: 509
Tải xuống: 5

Đã xuất bản

24.06.2024

Cách trích dẫn

[1]
H. T. T. N. Hồ Thị Thiên Ngân, “Enhancing COVID-19 (COVID-19/SARI/SVP) pandemic preparedness: Assessment of testing and treatment capacity of the health facilities in Can Tho City, Vietnam in 2023”, HIUJS, vol 6, tr 19–26, tháng 6 2024.

Số

Chuyên mục

HEALTH SCIENCES